CA
19749/87
410955/95; viz. because for 14 years of his service he was enjoying
lucrative private practice, for less than 10 years has he been without
salary, private practice, drawing for that latter period a considerably increased
salary,
besides a house allowance.
I suggested in 10985/95 that he should not have more than 2 years for prof'l qual, but I should not mind extending this to 3 years in his special case.
Considering that we are giving him 23 years in detail for service, 5 for climate and 5 which we will not specify being partly for professional qualifications partly because we have retired him slightly before he wished to go.
I am satisfied that this is equitable treatment. If you want further light on the subject, please read 10985/95.
All the circumstances under which prevented making D'Agre retire, he is being compulsorily retired at 60, practically on the ground of physical unfitness for further service.
Evidence of his unfitness...
(2) But if 3 years is allowed for professional qualifications, I would not also add 2 years as proposed for "Extraordinary merit" under s. 8 of Pension Rules. I would therefore approve a pension of 31/60.
Calculation: $7186300 x 31/60 = $3255
When this is settled, please refer to Pris. Sec. to see as to his successor, but I imagine the proposal on this point will be approved.
-1-
M. Graham
Daleins
Bug 7/4/97
Dr. Ayres calculation
1. We had better give him "A" as my 33-60 this time.
B & L (5)-71703-3003-90
There is no doubt whatever that Atkinson - the second man in the department and head of the hospital - is an excellent man and should succeed Ayres.
This paper recommends M. H. F. Wilson to be his successor. C.P.L. 7 April seems to have been delayed somewhere & a draft is annexed for consideration.
As to Dr. Agre's pension, I am strongly against giving any addition under sec. 8 of the Pensions Ordinance which provides for "cases of Extraordinary merit".
:
muninter
CA
19749/87
410955/95; viz. because for 14 years of his service he was Enjoying
lucrative private practice, I for less than 10 years has he been without
salay, private practice, drawing for that latter period a considerably increased
II
besides a house allowance.
Isuggested in 10985/9. that be
crot
tut
not to have mon than 2 years for prof! qual, but I should not mind extending
special case Zears,
this to 3.
Considering
we are
he is
Amy A
"have no medical
The risentan
officerscla the full add after only few year
x
23
in detail
for service, 5 for climate and 5 which we will not specify being 111 partly for professional qualifications
partly
because we have retired him
slightly before the wished to go
$
I am satisfied that is equitable treatment. If you
want fouther light
the subject, please
m
10985.95
rea, but
private prac
2.
all the cricês under which prevents making D'Agres retire, [ He is being compulsoril retired to.. 60, practically on the ground physical unfitness for furt comin
Evidence of his unfition] (2) But if 3 years is allowed for profequal to Twold not also add 2 years as proposed for "Extraordin merit " under s. 8 of Pensiin Mt. I would there for approve a pension
hre
of
31
60
an
7/186300
$3255
When this is settled.
Pris. Sec. to see
as to his successor,
but Imniagine the food recon
on this point will be approved
-1-
M. Graham
Daleins
?
Bug 7/4/97
Dr. Ayres calculation
1. We had better give as
"A" my 33-60 this Heat
nj
B & L (5)-71703-3003 -90
is
to San
Say
see minutes
There is no doubt whatever that of?
Attinson -the second man in the
it & head of the hospital-
department
medical def
as the
Govenor
D
He is an excellent
Should, as Succeed : Ayres
man.
This paper
Recommends,
M. H. F. Wilson to fee
C.PL. 7. April
Scerns
to have been
delayed somewhere & a draft is annexed for consideration.
As to Dr Angress heusion. I am strongly against giving
any
addition under sac. 8 of the Pensions
which proviples for "casen of. Numata
i
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.